Bible Homes Inc. is a registered 501(c)(3) nonprofit ministry501(c)(3) nonprofit Contact한국어
BIBLE HOMESYeshua Literal Version Get Involved
Menu

Bible Studies · Biblical Manuscripts

Biblical Manuscripts: An Overview

No autograph of any biblical book survives. The Hebrew and Greek texts read today have been established by comparing manuscripts copied over many centuries. This page surveys the transmission as a whole; detailed descriptions of the individual witnesses are provided in Old Testament Manuscripts and New Testament Manuscripts.

What Is a Manuscript?

יָקוּם לְעוֹלָםYAQUM LE'OLAM — shall stand forever

The Autographs Are Lost; the Manuscripts Carry the Text

A manuscript is a document copied by hand before the spread of printing. No autograph of any book of the Old or New Testament is extant. The original text is therefore reconstructed by comparing the surviving manuscripts, ancient versions, and quotations; this discipline is called textual criticism.

The grass withers, the flower fades; but the word of our God shall stand forever.Isaiah 40:8 · Yeshua Literal Version
Original-language manuscriptsTexts copied in Hebrew, Aramaic, and Greek
Ancient versionsSeptuagint, Targumim, Peshitta, Latin versions, and others
QuotationsPassages cited in patristic and rabbinic literature
LectionariesManuscripts arranged for liturgical reading (New Testament)

Materials and Forms

On What, and in What Form, Manuscripts Were Written

The material, format, and script of a manuscript provide the primary evidence for determining its date and character.

PapyrusA writing material made by laying strips of the papyrus plant of the Nile region crosswise. Vulnerable to moisture, it survived chiefly in the dry climate of Egypt; a substantial share of New Testament manuscripts from the second to fourth centuries are papyri.
ParchmentAnimal skin stretched thin and dried rather than tanned. Its durability made it the principal material for biblical manuscripts from the fourth century onward; most of the Dead Sea Scrolls were likewise written on skin.
ScrollSheets joined end to end and rolled. This is the traditional form of Old Testament manuscripts; the Torah scrolls read in the synagogue are still copied in this form today.
CodexFolded sheets bound together as a book. Early Christians adopted the codex at an early date, and most extant New Testament manuscripts of the second and third centuries are codices.
Majuscule and MinusculeGreek manuscripts shifted from majuscule (uncial) to minuscule script around the ninth century. The earliest dated minuscule is Gregory–Aland 461, from 835.
PalimpsestA reused manuscript whose original writing was scraped or washed off and overwritten. The fifth-century Codex Ephraemi Rescriptus (C 04) is the best-known example; the erased text is recovered and studied.

Chronology of Transmission

How the Text Was Handed Down

The principal witnesses to the Old and New Testaments are arranged chronologically below. Most dates are estimates based on script and archaeological context, and scholarly opinion varies.

  1. Late 7th–early 6th c. BC (approx.)

    The Ketef Hinnom Silver Scrolls

    Two small silver scrolls excavated in 1979 from a tomb in the Hinnom Valley, Jerusalem. They bear wording corresponding to the priestly blessing of Numbers 6:24–26 and are regarded as the oldest known artifacts containing text that corresponds to the biblical text. Their dating is disputed.

  2. 3rd–1st c. BC

    The Septuagint (LXX)

    Beginning with the Pentateuch, the Hebrew Scriptures were translated into Greek in Alexandria. Its Hebrew parent text (Vorlage) differs from the Masoretic Text in places, making it a key witness for Old Testament textual criticism.

  3. 3rd c. BC–1st c. AD

    The Dead Sea Scrolls · The Nash Papyrus

    Manuscripts discovered between 1947 and 1956 in eleven caves near Qumran. They include copies or fragments of nearly every book of the Old Testament except Esther; the complete Isaiah scroll 1QIsaᵃ (Cave 1, c. 2nd c. BC) is the best known. Before these discoveries, the Nash Papyrus (c. 2nd–1st c. BC), containing the Decalogue and the Shema, was the oldest known witness to the Hebrew biblical text.

  4. 1st–2nd c. AD

    Composition of the New Testament · Convergence on the Proto-Masoretic Text

    The books of the New Testament were written in Greek and circulated and copied as individual documents. In the same period the Old Testament converged on the proto-Masoretic consonantal text; manuscripts from Wadi Murabba'at and Masada agree almost entirely with the medieval Masoretic Text.

  5. 2nd–3rd c.

    Early New Testament Papyri · Early Versions

    Witnesses from this period include 𝔓52, a fragment of John 18 (dated to the first half or middle of the 2nd c., though disputed); 𝔓46 of the Pauline Epistles; 𝔓66 of John; and 𝔓75 of Luke and John (all dated around 200). The early versions—Old Latin, Syriac, Coptic, and others—also began to take shape in this period.

  6. 4th–5th c.

    Majuscule Parchment Codices · The Vulgate

    Codex Vaticanus (B 03) and Codex Sinaiticus (א 01), which contain both the Septuagint and the New Testament, were copied in the fourth century, and Codex Alexandrinus (A 02) in the fifth. The Latin Vulgate, undertaken by Jerome in 382 at the commission of Pope Damasus, was completed around 405.

  7. 6th–10th c.

    The Masoretes · New Testament Minuscules

    The Masoretes of Tiberias supplied the consonantal text with vowel points, accents (te'amim), and Masoretic notes. The Cairo Codex of the Prophets (895 according to its colophon, though the date is disputed) and the Aleppo Codex (c. 930), in the tradition of the Ben Asher family, belong to this period. The several hundred thousand fragments from the genizah of the Ben Ezra Synagogue in Cairo, made known to scholarship in the late nineteenth century, also include many biblical manuscripts of this era. For the New Testament, minuscule manuscripts predominate from about the ninth century, most of them bearing the Byzantine text.

  8. 1008/1009

    The Leningrad Codex (B19ᴬ)

    The oldest extant complete manuscript of the Hebrew Bible. Copied in Cairo, it is held by the National Library of Russia in St. Petersburg (shelfmark Firkovich B 19 A). The major Hebrew critical editions of today, and the Old Testament base text of the Yeshua Literal Version, rest on this manuscript.

  9. From the mid-15th c.

    From Manuscript to Print

    With the spread of movable-type printing, the biblical text began to be transmitted in printed editions. That development is summarized under “Printed and Critical Editions” below.

Principles of Textual Criticism

Criteria for Evaluating Variant Readings

Where manuscripts differ—that is, where variant readings exist—scholars weigh external evidence (the manuscripts themselves) together with internal evidence (the copying process and the author’s style). The following criteria have been widely used in classical textual criticism.

01Weighing External EvidenceThe date of manuscripts, the character of their text, their geographical distribution, and their genealogical relationships are assessed. The classical maxim is that manuscripts are to be weighed, not counted.
02The More Difficult ReadingLectio difficilior potior. Because scribes tended to smooth difficult expressions, the more difficult reading is considered more likely to be original.
03The Shorter ReadingLectio brevior potior. This criterion assumes that scribes tended to add. Studies of scribal habits in the early papyri (J. R. Royse and others), however, show that omission was also frequent, and the criterion is now applied with caution.
04The Reading That Explains the OthersThe reading that best accounts for the rise of the other variants is preferred as original. It is now regarded as the most fundamental criterion.
05Types of Scribal ErrorHaplography (writing once what should be written twice), dittography (writing twice what should be written once), homoioteleuton (skipping between similar endings), harmonization to parallel passages, and deliberate correction are identified.
06Authorial Style and ContextKnown as intrinsic probability: the reading that best fits the author’s vocabulary, grammar, thought, and immediate context is considered.

Scholars differ on how these criteria should be applied. Reasoned eclecticism weighs external and internal evidence together (the Nestle–Aland and UBS text); thoroughgoing eclecticism decides primarily on internal evidence; Byzantine priority (the Robinson–Pierpont text) and the Majority Text position give weight to the process of transmission and the testimony of the majority of manuscripts; and other scholars defend the Textus Receptus. This page does not adjudicate among these positions.

Old and New Testaments

Two Traditions of Different Character

The Old Testament was transmitted under strict control around a small number of standard manuscripts; the New Testament was transmitted from an early date in many manuscripts across a wide area. The methods of textual criticism differ accordingly.

AspectOld TestamentNew Testament
LanguageHebrew (portions of Daniel, Ezra, and elsewhere in Aramaic)Koine Greek
Character of transmissionSeveral textual forms coexisted in the Qumran period, but by about the 1st–2nd c. AD the text converged on the proto-Masoretic consonantal text and was thereafter copied under strict scribal norms.Copied and disseminated actively in many regions from an early date; a large proportion of variants arose in the first few centuries.
Earliest witnessesKetef Hinnom silver scrolls · Dead Sea Scrolls (3rd c. BC–1st c. AD)Papyri of the 2nd–3rd centuries
Standard manuscriptsMasoretic manuscripts of the Ben Asher tradition, such as the Leningrad and Aleppo CodicesNo single standard manuscript; the text is reconstructed by comparing many manuscripts.
Extent of evidenceSome 200 biblical manuscripts among the Dead Sea Scrolls (including fragments); numerous medieval Masoretic manuscriptsApproximately 5,800 Greek manuscripts; more than 10,000 Latin manuscripts (estimates vary)
Principal ancient witnessesSeptuagint · Samaritan Pentateuch · Targumim · Peshitta · VulgateOld Latin · Syriac (Old Syriac, Peshitta) · Coptic · Vulgate · patristic citations
Distinctive toolsThe Masorah · Ketiv and Qere (the written and the read form)Gregory–Aland catalogue · text-types · Coherence-Based Genealogical Method (CBGM)
Standard critical editionsBHS · BHQ · Hebrew University Bible (HUB)Nestle–Aland 28th ed. · UBS 5th ed. · Robinson–Pierpont · ECM

Well-known Old Testament variants include Deuteronomy 32:8 (Masoretic Text בְּנֵי יִשְׂרָאֵל “sons of Israel”; 4QDeutʲ and the Septuagint attest readings of the “sons of God” type), Isaiah 53:11 (1QIsaᵃ and the Septuagint include “light,” אוֹר), and Psalm 22:17 (Masoretic Text כָּאֲרִי “like a lion”; Septuagint ὤρυξαν “they dug”; 22:16 in conventional English numbering). These are treated in detail in Old Testament Manuscripts.

New Testament Text-Types

Four Names for Families of Manuscripts

Since the nineteenth century, New Testament textual criticism has grouped manuscripts into text-types according to shared readings. The Coherence-Based Genealogical Method (CBGM) now used in preparing the ECM analyzes relationships between individual manuscripts rather than text-types, and the validity of the text-type classification itself remains under discussion.

AlexandrianCentered on early manuscripts from Egypt such as 𝔓66, 𝔓75, Codex Vaticanus (B 03), and Codex Sinaiticus (א 01). Characterized by concise readings, it is judged by many modern critical scholars to be closest to the original.
WesternRepresented by Codex Bezae (D 05), the Old Latin, and some Old Syriac evidence. It shows frequent paraphrase and addition and is notably longer in Acts. Despite its name, it is not confined to the West.
CaesareanAssociated with Family 1 (f¹), Family 13 (f¹³), and Codex Koridethi (Θ 038). Proposed in connection with Origen’s work at Caesarea, its status as a distinct text-type is now widely doubted.
ByzantineComprises the great majority of extant Greek manuscripts and predominates from the ninth century. Codex Alexandrinus (A 02) in the Gospels is an early witness. Most critical scholars regard it as a later, refined text; advocates of Byzantine priority regard it as the textform that most faithfully preserves the original.
Open Bibles and a laptop used for translation work

Printed and Critical Editions

From Manuscript Text to Critical Edition

After the advent of printing, the biblical text was standardized through a small number of printed editions. From the nineteenth century onward, critical editions were compiled from systematic collation of newly discovered manuscripts; a critical edition presents the text together with an apparatus recording the manuscript variants.

Old Testament critical editions generally print a single manuscript (a diplomatic text) and present variants in the apparatus, whereas New Testament critical editions usually present a text reconstructed from many manuscripts (an eclectic text).

Old Testament

DateEditionSignificance
1488Soncino Hebrew BibleThe first printed edition of the complete Hebrew Bible
1524–1525Second Rabbinic Bible (published by Bomberg, edited by Jacob ben Hayyim)The standard text of the Hebrew Bible until the early twentieth century
From 1906Biblia Hebraica (BH, ed. R. Kittel)First and second editions follow the ben Hayyim text; from the third edition (BHK, 1929–1937) the Leningrad Codex is the base text
1967/1977Biblia Hebraica Stuttgartensia (BHS)Leningrad Codex · the standard scholarly critical edition
From 1995Hebrew University Bible (HUB)Critical edition based on the Aleppo Codex · published in fascicles
From 2004Biblia Hebraica Quinta (BHQ)Leningrad Codex · successor to BHS · publication in fascicles ongoing
Electronic textWestminster Leningrad Codex (WLC)An electronic text of the Leningrad Codex prepared by the J. Alan Groves Center at Westminster Theological Seminary
Electronic textOpen Scriptures Hebrew Bible (OSHB)An open resource adding morphological data to a WLC-based text

New Testament

DateEditionSignificance
Printed 1514New Testament of the Complutensian PolyglotThe first printed Greek New Testament (circulated in the early 1520s)
1516Erasmus, Novum Instrumentum omneThe first published Greek New Testament · based on a few late minuscules; the last six verses of Revelation were back-translated from Latin
1550–1551Stephanus, 3rd and 4th editionsManuscript variants noted in the 3rd edition · the modern verse divisions introduced in the 4th (1551)
1633Elzevir, 2nd editionThe name “Textus Receptus” derives from the wording of its preface
1881Westcott–Hort, The New Testament in the Original GreekCritical edition giving priority to Codex Vaticanus (B 03) and Codex Sinaiticus (א 01)
From 1898Nestle(–Aland), Novum Testamentum GraeceCurrent 28th edition (NA28, 2012) · text substantially identical to the UBS 5th edition (2014)
1982Hodges–Farstad, The Greek New Testament According to the Majority TextA text following the readings of the majority of manuscripts
From 1991Robinson–Pierpont, Byzantine TextformA reconstruction of the Byzantine textform (revised 2005) · public domain
From 1997Editio Critica Maior (ECM, Institute for New Testament Textual Research, Münster)Large-scale critical edition reflecting the full manuscript tradition · applies the CBGM · in progress
2010 · 2017SBLGNT · Tyndale House Greek New Testament (THGNT)Independently edited modern critical texts

Base Texts of the Yeshua Literal Version

The Original-Language Texts Underlying the Translation

The Yeshua Literal Version (YLV) is translated directly from the Hebrew and Greek, using the following two texts as its base.

Old Testament — Open Scriptures Hebrew Bible (OSHB)A Hebrew text based on the Westminster Leningrad Codex (WLC), that is, the Masoretic Text of the Leningrad Codex (B19ᴬ). Chapter and verse numbering also follows the Masoretic system; it may therefore differ from conventional English numbering in Malachi (English 4:1–6 is 3:19–24), Joel (four chapters), and Psalms whose superscriptions are counted as verse 1, among others. License: CC BY 4.0.
New Testament — Robinson-Pierpont Byzantine TextformThe Byzantine text edited by Maurice A. Robinson and William G. Pierpont. It is an edition reconstructing the Byzantine textform attested by the majority of extant Greek manuscripts, and is distinct from both the Textus Receptus and the Nestle–Aland text. License: public domain.

The sources and licenses of the base texts and word numbering are set out in Text Sources and Copyright; the principles of translation are explained in Why Literal.

Get Involved

You are invited to join the movement of sharing the Scriptures and love